Features for directing work.
Assign agents, choose enabled models, manage their resources and review or pause scheduled tasks.
Decide which agents your team uses, which models power them and which information and tools they access. Keep people involved in the decisions that matter.
In a reconciliation, reviewing the proposal and authorizing posting are different responsibilities from preparing the work.
When evaluating Terminal, distinguish product features from the decisions made for your implementation.
Assign agents, choose enabled models, manage their resources and review or pause scheduled tasks.
Define who reviews, what needs approval and how to handle missing information or an incorrect proposal.
ERP, CRM or accounting system connections and permissions determine what each tool can query or execute.
The agent prepares. A person reviews and authorizes where the process requires it. If something needs correction, the work returns for review.
In a reconciliation, that means reviewing the entry before posting it. The example shows who prepares, who decides and when work can continue.
Illustrative demonstration. Fictional data; no operations are executed.The person in charge reviews the proposal with its supporting documents. If a discrepancy remains unresolved, the work returns for review. Posting to the system happens after approval.
Explore the reconciliation exampleThe work to solve, the people in charge, the tools and terms of use.
Checks authorized information and performs tasks within its configured scope.
Reviews exceptions, corrects proposals and authorizes steps requiring human judgment.
Configuration starts with understanding how work is done and where a decision can change the result.
A clear outcome, an accountable person and criteria we can explain.
Required sources, tools, models, access and approval points.
Missing information, incorrect proposals and decisions that must return to the team.
We observe the work, refine criteria and agree on what to expand.
It means the company sets the conditions for using AI in its work. It defines who uses each agent, the information and tools it works with, the model it uses and when a person must intervene. Terminal brings that work into a shared space. Configuration and available controls are reviewed for each implementation.
Yes, from the options enabled for your company. Model choice is part of agent configuration. In the demo, we review available options, how to choose them and what to assess for your task. Availability and terms are confirmed when defining the implementation.
Work is organized by people, teams and assigned agents. Before implementation, we define who needs each agent and which sources and tools it requires. Effective scope also depends on connections and permissions in source systems; we validate this with your team when configuring the process.
Not necessarily. It means placing human intervention where the process needs it. An information search and posting an accounting entry do not have the same impact. In the accounting workflow shown, a person approves before the agent posts the entry. Other review points are agreed based on the task.
The process must define when to stop, ask for context or return to a person. Proposals requiring approval are reviewed before continuing. Error cases and incomplete information are tested during preparation; results are reviewed and criteria adjusted in operation. Human review helps control the work but does not make the system infallible.
You can resume sessions, consult results and files, and review scheduled task runs. You can also pause a schedule. Review and authorization of actions are defined by the process: an accounting entry, for example, requires approval before posting.
They depend on the tools, models and configuration used. Before implementation, review what information is shared, with which services and under what terms. Model training, retention and data residency conditions are reviewed against the chosen providers and your company's needs.
The task it must solve, the team using it, the sources it can query and the tools it needs. We also agree on what it can prepare independently, what must return to a person and who validates the result. We test that scope before extending use to more tasks or teams.
No. The model is one part of the decision. Available information, enabled tools, agent instructions and human review also matter. In a demo, we can explore those decisions using a task from your company and review the available model options.
Tell us what work you want to improve. We review the process, the tools and where your team needs to step in.